end to the parasit!c and useless p0l!t!cal caste that is destroying this country

"The greatest danger to the State is independent intellectual criticism; there is no better way to stifle that criticism than to attack any isolated voice, any raiser of new doubts, as a profane violator of the wisdom of his ancestors.  Another potent ideological force is to deprecate the individual and exalt the collectivity of society.  For since any given rule implies majority acceptance, any ideological danger to that rule can only start from one or a few independently thinking individuals.  The new idea, much less the new critical idea, must needs begin as a small minority opinion; therefore, the State must nip the view in the bud by ridiculing any view that defies the opinions of the mass.  "Listen only to your brothers" or "adjust to society" thus become ideological weapons for crushing individual dissent.  By such measures, the masses will never learn of the nonexistence of the Emperor's clothes." Anatomy of the State, Murray N. Rothbard Oops, they did it again. First Giorgia Meloni was elected prime minister of Italy.  This despite the objections and smears of the self-important and seemingly all-powerful US Deep State and its Mockingbird press, which in the run up to the Italian general election had painted her as the second coming of Benito Mussolini. Never mind that the politics of the corporatist Deep State are a lot closer to Mussolini's fascist vision than those of Meloni, who in the "real world" pragmatically governs from center-right – to the great disappointment of many on both sides of the spectrum. In the current US corporate media-approved version of the political spectrum, the go-to political character assassination terms "Trump-like", "alt right", "far right", fascist, libertarian, neo-Nazi, and radical are all bundled up as synonyms, interchangeably and reflexively applied to anyone whose political beliefs are to the right of the modern embodiments of Marx and Engels' version of socialism collectively referred to as "Woke" culture. Each interchangeable term being repeatedly weaponized and launched in harmonized Qassam rocket barrages against non-sycophant independent thinkers, writers, politicians, scientists or physicians who refuse to contort their speech to fit the approved narratives, gender identifiers and pretzel logic of the Globalist oligarchy.   Unfortunately for those who maintain the thesaurus of approved "advocacy journalism" euphemisms, "anti-Semitic" has recently become both too inconvenient and too complicated, necessitating that it be struck from currently approved character assassination lexicon.   After decades of alternating corrupt mismanagement by the two entrenched traditional Argentine parties (Peronists vs Radicals), an academic economist of the Austrian school named Javier Milei has been elected President of Argentina, adding salt to the self-inflicted wounds of approved narrative defenders. And once again, we are predictably being treated to the usual stream of character assassination and hate speech from Deep State corporatist media lapdogs.  My, how the Mockingbird does love to sing.  As with Meloni's election, we have been treated to yet another peek at the Wizard behind the curtain playing his Mighty Wurlitzer. Labeling Javier Milei as a television personality, a common trope in both domestic and international corporate media, is a gross distortion of reality. Why is Milei's training in the Austrian School of economics relevant? Because the economic logic of the Austrian School is based on strict adherence to the idea that social phenomena result exclusively from the motivations and actions of individuals. Austrian school theorists hold that economic theory should be exclusively derived from basic principles of human action. In other words, growth in the "wealth of nations" is the consequence of actions of the individuals which create value and wealth. The Austrian School emphasizes the importance of free markets, individualism, and minimal government intervention. It should come as no surprise that Ayn Rand highly recommended the economic writings of the Austrian school, particularly those of Ludwig von Mises. Is this starting to make sense now? Dr. Milei is basically an intellectual academic who became a truth warrior in response to the damage he saw being done to his country by a parasitic administrative state. In other words, he is yet another intellectual critic who is mad as hell and not going to take it anymore.  He graduated with a degree in economics from the University of Belgrano, and continued on to obtain a masters degree and doctorate in economics from the Instituto de Desarrollo Economico y Social and Torcuato di Tella University. For over twenty years he taught University-level courses in macroeconomics, economic growth, microeconomics, and mathematics for economists, and authored several books in economics and politics. His signature presidential campaign rallying cry has been "Long live freedom, damn it!", coupled with criticism of the "thieving and corrupt political class" of Argentina. Austrian school logic formulated as populism for the masses. Labeling Dr. Milei as Trump-like is clearly a gross oversimplification. Don't cry for Argentina, a once and future jewel and the second largest South American country, which is endowed with an embarrassment of natural resource wealth. Which assets have been mismanaged for decades by a parasitic and dysfunctional government, resulting in widespread economic devastation. During the 19th century the country enjoyed an almost-unparalleled increase in prosperity, resulting in early 20th century Argentina becoming the seventh-wealthiest nation in the world.  In 1896, Argentina's GDP per capita surpassed that of the United States, and the country was consistently in the global economic top ten until at least 1920. Argentina remained among the fifteen richest countries until the meteoric mid-century rise to the Presidency of a previously unknown minor military leader named Juan Perón.  This political earthquake was followed by a cascade of bad management, political, social, and economic upheaval, USG meddling, and a notorious "dirty war" of the State against dissident citizens. Now, after decades of high government spending and economic stagnation, despite abundant natural resources, Argentina has become one of the poorest countries in the world. A case study in how a prosperous modern economy can be strangled by an overbearing and corrupt administrative state bureaucracy.  Sound familiar? Dr. Javier Milei leads the "La Libertad Avanza" (Liberty Advances) coalition, and has vowed to "put an end to the parasitic and useless political caste that is destroying this country". His parties' campaign has broken the mold of traditional Argentine politics by focusing heavily on social media, particularly TikTok and YouTube, where he developed a strong following among younger supporters. "Today, the reconstruction of Argentina begins" he confidently asserted, as historic election results poured in. "Argentina's situation is critical. The changes our country needs are drastic. There is no room for gradualism, no room for lukewarm measures." "Argentina will return to the place in the world which it should never have lost." No wonder the US Deep State and it's Mockingbird media are out to draw blood from this charismatic populist economist. One who dares to combine alternative social media presence with attacks on a parasitic and useless political caste. The elite members of the Atlantic Council and the Council on Foreign Relations must be wetting themselves.  Time to let slip the dogs of the censorship-industrial complex, and to watch the Wikipedia and Google ranking manipulation begin.  Don't forget the popcorn. The truth is that they should be running for their stockpile of Depends.  For Austrian school economist Milei self-identifies as an anarcho-capitalist.  Not as a "Trump-like", "alt right", "far right", fascist, libertarian, neo-Nazi radical. As such, Milei happens to be at the leading edge of a growing contrarian intellectual movement which directly challenges the legitimacy of the administrative state.  One which has now grown to the point where it can no longer be dismissed as "a small minority opinion", and has been catapulted onto the world stage by an independent Latin American nation with nothing to lose and everything to gain. I kept reading and hearing the term "anarcho-capitalism" pop up in edgy discussions with the various thought leaders whom I encounter in my daily random walk through the community of freedom and sovereignty advocates.  Trying it out for size with various free-thinking investors, I repeatedly heard "Yes, I think that term fits the way I think about things".   So, having long ago learned to distrust Wikipedia for opinions on any freethinking ideas, I started texting others in my circle.  And I struck gold with Jeffrey Tucker of Brownstone Institute.  I asked Jeffrey "So, are you an anarcho-capitalist?" He immediately replied "I've never called myself that.  Too rationalistic and formulistic for my tastes.  I just prefer freedom generally speaking, though my teacher was the creator of that term". Bingo.  I replied "Interesting.  Who is?"  He simply responded "Murray Rothbard".  I came back with "OK, so now I have to look him up.  Recommended reading on background?" "Oh goodness, it's all so much", he replied (I can easily imagine his voice) "I kind of recoil at most of this heavy ideological stuff these days, but let me think for a moment". And then he threw open a new "thought" door for me to pass through.  "Here is Rothbard's view of the state as an institution" he wrote, followed by a PDF copy of the book "Anatomy of the State".  I sent a copy over to Jill as we were boarding yet another flight across the pond, and we both started pouring through this little 58 page gem published by the Ludwig von Mises Institute.  We were astounded by the ideas flowing from the pages.  And suddenly it all made sense.  Idea space we had been independently groping, like the blind men trying to describe an elephant, suddenly came into focus, and aspects of the Globalists' actions and agenda took on new meaning. Indeed, as captured in Dr. Milei's vow to "put an end to the parasitic and useless political caste that is destroying this country", at the core of Rothbard's analysis is the thesis that the State is an insatiable economic parasite, constantly growing by feeding off of the surplus productive labor of those free sovereign individuals over which it asserts the right to govern.   If one was seeking to develop a diametrically opposed alternative to globalist "one world government" techno-fascism, anarcho-capitalism would be a pretty good candidate in my opinion.   In the modern Brave New World which is being aggressively pushed toward a "Dark Aeon" transhumanist future at breakneck speed, the global financial and political elite find the decentralized diversity of cultures and independent nation states an inconvenient source of systemic "friction", of inefficiency in navigating and achieving the financially optimized utilitarian, Malthusian, homogenized transhuman future which they seek in their endless quest for greater return on investment.  So what's a nirvana and immortality-craving psychopathic oligarch to do, in his quest to forever maintain wealth and global dominance?  Substitute a single "harmonized" global government to resolve the messy chaos of human cultural and political diversity.  Trade a complicated mix of different small parasites for one big one to rule them all.  Problem solved.  Those of us being parasitized will own nothing, be happy, have nowhere to go and no way to get out from under the thumb of this New World Order.  What could possibly go wrong? I submit that we have already lived through a B-grade movie version of that future during the COVIDcrisis of the last four years.  You ask what could possibly go wrong with a top-down, centralized authoritarian diktat response to daily management of a globalized one-world socioeconomic system?  If you do not immediately recognize the answer, than you are clearly suffering from mass formation (psychosis), and best of luck adapting to the future which is coming at you like a freight train. Judging by the political stalemate and exploding debt which are the defining characteristics of the current US Imperial administrative state, it may already be too late to stop the out of control freight train barreling towards the DC Beltway.  As Rothbard points out, the debts of any government are canceled in the event of either revolution or foreign takeover after a lost (political or economic) war.  And treaties are not contracts.  The indebtedness and collapse of the British royal Tudor family consequent to a failed civil war took down the Italian Medici banking empire.  Those who live by the sword often die by the sword. What fate awaits the Blackrock/Vanguard/State Street megafund if either USA or PRC/CCP default? But meantime (back at the ranch), by monitoring this economic and political experiment involving a government influenced by anarcho-capitalistic socioeconomic theory as it runs its course in Argentina, we may be treated to a foreshadowing of the future which a post BRICS currency west may soon encounter.  Breaking up with an entrenched fiat currency will be hard.  I suspect that softening the blow is one motive driving Globalist advocacy for central bank digital currency (CBDC). Perhaps the Mockingbird will not sing too loudly, its noisy territorial defense making it harder for freedom lovers to learn necessary lessons from this new Argentine economic experiment.  Suffice to say, investment opportunities abound for those who are awake and alert.   But I have no doubt that, in stubborn non-conformity with Malthusian predictions, both hope and innovation will continue to spring eternal in the human heart. HISTORY AS A RACE BETWEEN STATE POWER AND SOCIAL POWER Just as the two basic and mutually exclusive interrelations between men are peaceful cooperation or coercive exploitation, production or predation, so the history of mankind, particularly its economic history, may be considered as a contest between these two principles. On the one hand, there is creative productivity, peaceful exchange and cooperation; on the other, coercive dictation and predation over those social relations. Albert Jay Nock happily termed these contesting forces: "social power" and "State power."  Social power is man's power over nature, his cooperative transformation of nature's resources and insight into nature's laws, for the benefit of all participating individuals. Social power is the power over nature, the living standards achieved by men in mutual exchange. State power, as we have seen, is the coercive and parasitic seizure of this production—a draining of the fruits of society for the benefit of nonproductive (actually antiproductive) rulers.  While social power is over nature, State power is power over man. Through history, man's productive and creative forces have, time and again, carved out new ways of transforming nature for man's benefit. These have been the times when social power has spurted ahead of State power, and when the degree of State encroachment over society has considerably lessened.  But always, after a greater or smaller time lag, the State has moved into these new areas, to cripple and confiscate social power once more. If the seventeenth through the nineteenth centuries were, in many countries of the West, times of accelerating social power, and a corollary increase in freedom, peace, and material welfare, the twentieth century has been primarily an age in which State power has been catching up—with a consequent reversion to slavery, war, and destruction. In this century, the human race faces, once again, the virulent reign of the State—of the State now armed with the fruits of man's creative powers, confiscated and perverted to its own aims.  The last few centuries were times when men tried to place constitutional and other limits on the State, only to find that such limits, as with all other attempts, have failed. Of all the numerous forms that governments have taken over the centuries, of all the concepts and institutions that have been tried, none has succeeded in keeping the State in check. The problem of the State is evidently as far from solution as ever. Perhaps new paths of inquiry must be explored, if the successful, final solution of the State question is ever to be attained. Anatomy of the State, Murray N. Rothbard © 2023 Robert W Malone, MD Virginia

Things you should know about suicide. 

Things You Should Know About Suicide According to the World Health Organization, approximately 700,000 people die by suicide each year and it is the fourth leading cause of death among 15–29-year-olds worldwide. It's a huge and complex global public health issue, and most experts agree that suicide deaths occur for many different reasons and are the result of a complex interplay between many different risk and protective factors (which change over time).  Still, there are a lot of myths about it. Our goal today is to debunk some of these myths, and provide an evidence-based approach to helping people (perhaps including yourself) dealing with thoughts about suicide. This content should not be used as a substitute for professional mental health treatment. This content is designed for educational purposes. If you feel you may be suicidal, we strongly advise you to see a counselor, therapist, psychiatrist, or other appropriate professional right away. The resources listed at the end of this email can assist you in finding help.    Myths and facts about suicide  Myth #1: Asking about suicide makes somebody suicidal.   There are now many studies showing the opposite. People who are exposed to suicide-related content (e.g., questions about whether they have ever experienced suicidal thoughts) experienced reduced suicidal ideation and lowered the likelihood that the individual would later engage in suicidal behaviors (e.g., suicide attempt, non-suicidal self-injury). Similarly, asking persons with depression if they are having thoughts of suicide can reduce depressive symptoms in some cases. Lastly, some individuals at risk for suicide tend to experience less suicidal thoughts when they were assessed for risk.   Myth #2: If somebody really wants to kill themselves, nothing will stop them.   There have been several large, population-level studies that have found a similar pattern – most people (about 90%) who attempt suicide and live do not go on to die of suicide. Further, these studies also indicate that most people who attempt suicide and live, do not make another attempt (about 75%).   Myth #3: There is nothing we can do to help a person at risk for suicide.   Research supports several interventions and treatments that help reduce suicide risk. Limiting access to lethal methods for suicidal individuals (especially firearms) shows a strong association with reducing suicide deaths. There are also many well-researched psychotherapeutic treatments that may reduce the risk of suicide, such as Brief Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (B-CBT) and Dialectical Behavioral Therapy (DBT). Further, there are also quick interventions, such as Safety Plans (more on this later) that have been found to reduce suicide risk.   What do we actually know about suicide prevention?    There are well-researched, modern theories of suicide that agree on a general model for understanding why many people die of suicide. These theories include (but are not limited to) the Three-Step Theory (3ST) and the Interpersonal Theory of Suicide (ITS); often referred collectively as ideation-to-action frameworks. This picture shows the general overlapping principles of ideation-to-action frameworks (i.e., both 3ST and ITS models) that help describe why many people die by suicide. No single risk factor can accurately predict who will die of suicide. This is because suicide risk is the result of a complex, dynamic interaction between a multitude of fluctuating risk and protective factors, so it is important to treat suicide risk with the utmost seriousness.  Although no single risk factor can accurately predict who will die of suicide, there are some risk factors that have been identified that appear to put people at higher risk than others: Alienation/withdrawal Disconnectedness Loneliness Believing they are a burden to others  Hopelessness Some mental disorders (e.g., depression, ADHD, panic disorder, PTSD, bipolar disorder) These are risk factors that, in combination with the risk factors noted above, create high-risk conditions.  For example, having access to lethal means by itself does not make someone want to die, but someone with suicidal thoughts who also has access to lethal means is at higher risk than someone with suicidal thoughts without access to lethal means.   How do you help someone with suicidal thoughts?   Suicidal crises (when people are actively deciding whether to go through with suicide) appear to usually be very brief. Thus, getting people through the day (or even the hour) can save lives.  One simple intervention that has been found to reduce suicide risk is called a Safety Plan. Safety plans are often used by clinicians, doctors, and other health professionals to help people get through a suicidal crisis - a highly stressful, emotional period when someone may consider attempting suicide. You can use a safety plan to help someone else or to help yourself.  A safety plan involves the following steps in advance of being acutely suicidal, so that you have a concrete plan of what to do if you're feeling suicidal: 1. Recognize Warning Signs. What are some warning signs (e.g., thoughts, images, behaviors) that a suicidal crisis may be developing? List two or three warning signs. If you can't imagine warning signs for a crisis, try imagining warning signs for a strong, negative emotional reaction. Example: When I start to think that my family would be better off without me. 2. Consider Independent Coping Strategies. What can you do to take your mind off your problems without contacting another person? Examples: Deep breathing, or playing video games. 3. Find Social Settings That Provide Distraction. If these coping strategies haven't worked after a few minutes, that's okay - let's move on to something else. Who are some people you would feel comfortable talking to/calling that could distract you? What social settings could you move to (e.g., a coffee shop, library) to help distract yourself? Generate two or more people or locations (write down telephone numbers if available). Example: Bryan Bower (111) 111-1111, or Vasa Park (the busy park by my house). 4. Consider Contacts to Ask For Help. Who are some people you can call to ask for help? These are people you feel comfortable talking to about what is going on, the difficulties you are having, etc. Provide two or three people you could call (e.g., close friends, family members, spouse/partner) and their phone numbers if available. Example: Sister (Jane) (111) 111-1111. 5. Contact Mental Health Professionals and Organizations. If you are seeing a clinician (e.g., psychologist, psychiatrist, counselor/therapist), write their name(s) and phone number(s). Also, list an urgent care center (e.g., hospital emergency room) address and phone number. If you live in the U.S., write down the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline phone number (1-800-273-8255) if these are not currently available. Example: Dr. Cromarty, (111) 111-1111. 6. Make the environment safer. List one or two ways you could make your environment safer (e.g., have someone temporarily hold onto your firearms/lock up firearms and store ammunition separately, remove sharp objects from being easily accessible, or remove medicines that could be lethal if taken in large doses). Example: Temporarily give my firearms to my best friend. If you would like to build a safety plan and receive a copy of it by email, plus explore more resources and some coping skills to deal with thoughts about suicide, we encourage you to try our free, 30-minute mini-course:   Mini-Course: What You Need To Know About Suicide This mini-course was written by Brian W. Bauer as part of our 2020 Micro Grants, and it was checked by mental health experts. Please keep in mind that it's not intended to be used as a substitute for professional treatment.   More resources   Here are some other reliable resources and information about suicide that you or someone you know may find helpful.  The National Suicide Prevention Lifeline (1-800-273-8255). A US-based service that provides 24/7, free and confidential support for people in distress. This also provides prevention and crisis resources for the caller, their loved ones, as well as information on best practices for professionals. ReThink.Org A UK-based service that provides information and education about mental health symptoms, provides crisis and recovery services, as well as information and local resources. SuicideCallBackService An AUS-based, nationwide service that provides professional 24/7 telephone and online counseling to people who are affected by suicide. This site is designed to help those feeling suicidal, those who are worried about someone who is suicidal, and those who have lost someone to suicide. We hope you find this information useful. Talking about suicide can be uncomfortable, but it's also a way to bring awareness to this major public health issue. As the World Health Organization puts it: "Stigma, particularly surrounding mental disorders and suicide, means many people thinking of taking their own life or who have attempted suicide are not seeking help and are therefore not getting the help they need. The prevention of suicide has not been adequately addressed due to a lack of awareness of suicide as a major public health problem and the taboo in many societies to openly discuss it. To date, only a few countries have included suicide prevention among their health priorities and only 38 countries report having a national suicide prevention strategy." World Health Organization Overview on Suicide 🔈 We've released a new podcast episode! 🔈 Journalism in the age of AI  - Spencer is joined by Dylan Matthews, senior correspondent at Vox, to discuss questions like: Will large language models (LLMs) replace journalists any time soon? On what types of writing tasks do LLMs outperform humans? Have the US news media become less truth-seeking in recent decades? Or is truth-seeking behavior merely an aberration from a norm of propagandizing? What did you think of this newsletter? Let us know by replying to this email!    Here at ClearerThinking.org, we offer many free mini-courses and tools to help you make better decisions, hone your reasoning, and create the life you want! Here's a sampling of our work: Mood Booster - Brighten your disposition fast with scientifically tested exercises that can improve your mood and and dispel the blues. Mental Traps - Scientists have discovered a slew of systematic errors in human thought. Learn about a few of the mind's mistakes in this brief introduction. Overconfidence Analyzer - Discover how accurate your confidence levels are likely to be for any skill. Like this article? If so, we'd love for you to share it by clicking below. Share Tweet Forward

old building on central MUST REQUIRE affordable housing

This is WRONG!

https://l.facebook.com/l.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fseeclickfix.com%2Fissues%2F15400670%3Ffbclid%3DIwAR359Fi-r-j7Kta-D5p9PpHxkmp9Kw0Q_ISwSV80kVNdHzV3bE34UR0oIqo&h=AT01i4V0dQdZ24jT5jSzev539D_lcyP7EmZ_Pfj0rfcg-Txr4dtHrWJVKzDOM68aG7w5cCkupEnsdsieUNAC7XV88z4RhjIYbRiZHfhBTpgBZoSqNDrcnvfL7qwjjm8bLus-GUH81nhDVtNBBaUv7g0&__tn__=H-R&c[0]=AT1inGdOX3iT9f4hAGDyCw-iklueGgVZ3aZRH4ZJb6hiZz0ID7XiqP1Lf68HXjAcETwZ58o103f3eFT4IFA-QEQMYHXtxxpYmqCej3jSdiW4OPXhPPyeiJ_fhEKHNpsWx0_Jbg2mvYooi26J5vzJpYMN5z2owg

Taking down an old building on central MUST REQUIRE new apartments. These old apartments where the cheapest, smallest, dirtiest in town. NOTHING BUILT should be available to anyone at any price above the SAME $500/month that it was. WE DO NOT NEED more $500/night Airbnb's in town. 

PLEASE STOP CONSTRUCTION until they have plans for affordable housing in the top floor. . . 

See ClickFix PDF's Attached.

Thanks, God Bless,

Rafé

Cancer is ManMade just like C0v!d

Radiation Treatment Can Cause Cancer

Radiation treatment should be avoided as much as possible, since it’s toxic by nature. The side effects vary depending on the area of the body being treated. Along with fatigue, which is a near universal side effect of radiation therapy, you may experience any of the following:14

Hair loss	Memory problems	Nausea and vomiting
Skin changes	Headaches	Blurry vision
Swelling and tenderness	Throat problems, including trouble swallowing	Cough
Shortness of breath	Mouth problems	Taste changes
Less active thyroid gland	Diarrhea	Sexual problems
Fertility problems	Urinary and bladder problems

There’s also a risk that radiation therapy will lead to the development of a second cancer. Radiation exposure is a risk factor for most types of leukemia, along with myelodysplastic syndrome, a type of bone marrow cancer that may turn into leukemia.

Radiation therapy also increases the risk of solid tumors, including lung, thyroid, bone, pancreatic, stomach, liver and colorectal cancers, which often develop 10 years or more after the treatment. In one study of 52,613 patients who received radiation therapy, an increased risk of second cancer was found even after 40 years compared to the general population.15

“Radiotherapy has been considered as a double-edged sword as it has a well-established role in the management of solid cancers but unfortunately it is likely to induce cancers years after the treatment,” researchers explained in Radiation Oncology Journal.16 Chemotherapy is also linked with the development of second cancers.17

Susan Wadia-Ells, Ph.D., was inspired to write "Busting Breast Cancer: Five Simple Steps to Keep Breast Cancer Out of Your Body” after losing several friends to recurrent metastatic breast cancer, meaning cancer that was "successfully treated" at an early stage, only to later return as a terminal stage or metastatic disease.18

If you are going to submit your body to radiation, it’s best to protect your body with molecular hydrogen, probably two tablets twice a day for three days before and after the treatment. It would also be helpful to make sure you are taking 50 mg of niacinamide three times a day and methylene blue 50 mg once a day for a few days before and after the treatment.

Even Low-Dose Radiation Exposure Increases Cancer Deaths

Efforts to eliminate radiation therapy altogether may be necessary to protect cancer patients from subsequent cancers. A study that investigated workers in the nuclear industry in France, the U.K. and the U.S., who are exposed to low doses of ionizing radiation over longer periods of time, found an increased risk of cancer mortality.19

A linear increase in the relative rate of cancer was found with increasing radiation exposure, and risk of solid cancers increased by 52% for every unit of radiation each worker absorbed.20 The cancer risks from low-dose radiation exposure may, in fact, be underestimated. According to the study:21

“For the purposes of radiation protection, people often assume that low dose rate exposures pose less carcinogenic hazard than the high dose rate exposures experienced by the Japanese atomic bomb survivors ... Our study does not find evidence of reduced risk per unit dose for solid cancer among workers typically exposed to radiation at low dose rates.”

 Sources and References

• 1 BitChute, Dr. Nathan Goodyear Discusses Benefits of Vitamin C in Cancer Treatment August 3, 2022
• 2 NIH National Cancer Institute, Cancer Statistics
• 3, 4, 5, 6, 9 STAT News August 15, 2023
• 7 Journal of Clinical Oncology 41, no. 17_suppl (June 10, 2023) LBA7505-LBA7505
• 8, 11 N Engl J Med 2022; 386:923-932
• 10, 13 STAT News March 9, 2022
• 12 N Engl J Med 2012; 366:1663-1673
• 14 NIH National Cancer Institute, Radiation Therapy Side Effects
• 15, 16 Radiat Oncol J. 2018 Jun; 36(2): 85–94. 3. Gynecological malignancies
• 17 American Cancer Society, Second Cancers Related to Treatment
• 18 BitChute, Dr. Mercola Interviews Susan Wadia-Ells May 6, 2021
• 19 BMJ 2023;382:e074520
• 20 Medical Xpress August 16, 2023
• 21 BMJ 2023;382:e074520, Comparison with other studies