what internet

ONENESS, On truth connecting us all: https://patents.google.com/patent/US7421476B2

Thursday, June 16, 2022

Glyphosate-based Herbicides causes Breast Cancr

Glyphosate-based Herbicides - Breast Cancer Prevention Partners (BCPP)

In 2015 the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classified glyphosate as a ‘probable human carcinogen’.[7] However, in 2016 the U.S. EPA concluded that glyphosate is ‘not likely to be carcinogenic to humans’, based primarily on studies of non-occupational exposures.[8],[9]

In addition to containing high proportions of the active herbicidal ingredient glyphosate, GBHs also contain numerous other ingredients which may interact with glyphosate or have physiological effects of their own.

A 2021 study examined urinary AMPA levels and later development of breast cancer in Hawaiian women participating in the Multiethnic Cohort Study. AMPA was detected in most urine samples tested, although it was found in significantly more samples from women who went on to develop breast cancer in the next 10-15 years than in long-term healthy women. After adjusting for factors including race/ethnicity, age, and body mass index (BMI; a measure of relative obesity), there was a 4.5-fold increase in risk for developing breast cancer in women with the highest, vs the lowest, concentrations of urinary AMPA.[10]

In animal studies, exposure of young, postnatal male rats to low doses of GBHs led to changes in the mammary gland at the time of weaning. By early adulthood, these exposures were associated with further changes indicating an increased risk for developing mammary tumors.[11]  Low dose exposure of GBH to postnatal female rats led to long term changes in mammary gland structure in adulthood. These changes included an increase in the percent of mammary ductal cells with hyperplasia (increased proliferation) as well as morphological changes indicative of a pre-cancer state.[12]

While unfortunately this study did not look at mammary gland outcomes, the exposure of pregnant rats to GBH led to reproductive problems in the daughter pups of those pregnant dams, and structural congenital anomalies, delayed fetal growth and increased placental weight in the granddaughters (F2 generation) of the dams, even though the daughters were only exposed to GBHs during gestation.[13] Whether these transgenerational effects would be found in altered mammary gland structure and function, as well as risk for tumor development, remains to be studied.

Exposure of hormone receptor positive (ER+) human breast cells (MCF-7) in culture to commercial GBHs led to an increase in estrogen-induced cell proliferation. On the other hand, additives found in addition to glyphosate in commercial GBH formulations, did not activate the estrogen pathways in the MCF-7 cells.[14]

In another series of studies using cultured breast cancer cells, short term exposures of very low doses of GBH (Roundup) led to disruption of the cell cycle and DNA repair mechanisms in both estrogen receptor positive (MCF-7) and estrogen receptor negative (MDA-MB-468) cells.[15] Thus while glyphosate, alone, leads to increases in cell proliferation in this laboratory model, use of GBHs containing both the glyphosate and the additives found in Roundup, leads to cell death.

Who is most likely to be exposed to GBHs?

There are relatively few studies documenting glyphosate and GBH levels in people, and the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) does not include glyphosate or its commercial products in the library of chemicals it tests for in human urine and serum. Those studies that have been conducted indicate that agricultural workers who are exposed to GBHs, and their family members have significant body burdens of the chemicals, as do people who live in the general area where crops are sprayed. For people living in comparable areas, children have higher levels than do adults.[16]

Since there is not regular NHANES or other large-scale measurement of glyphosate and GBH levels, less is known about levels in the general population although a few studies have found measurable levels in urine sample from non-occupationally exposed people, including pregnant women.[17]

Who is most vulnerable to the health effects of GBHs?

Anyone exposed to glyphosate-based herbicides is susceptible to the endocrine-disrupting effects of the chemical. Glyphosate acts through estrogenic pathways suggesting that exposures during critical periods of breast development (e.g., gestation, early childhood, adolescence, pregnancy) may lead to deleterious effects on later risk for developing breast cancer.

What are the top tips to avoid exposure to glyphosate-based herbicides?

  • If outside in agricultural areas, wear fitted protective clothing including long sleeves, pants, boots, gloves and masks when exposed to pesticides containing toxic chemicals. Clothing made of synthetic material is more resistant to penetration by herbicides, and non-organic cotton may be contaminated by glyphosate.[18],[19]
  • Wash produce well before eating. Where possible, buy USDA certified organic produce, which has not been treated with pesticides or herbicides. This includes oats, soy and other beans, in addition to fruits and vegetables.

 

Updated 2021

[1] Thongprakasiang, Siriporn et al. “Glyphosate induces human breast cancer cells growth via estrogen receptors.” Food and Chemical Toxicology 59 (2013): 129-136. doi:10.1016/j.fct.2013.05.057.

[2] Zanardi, María V et al. “Glyphosate-based herbicide induces hyperplastic ducts in the mammary gland of aging Wistar rats.” Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology 501 (2020): 110658. doi:10.1016/j.mce.2019.110658.

[3] Benbrook, Charles M. “Trends in glyphosate herbicide use in the United States and globally.” Environmental Sciences Europe 28,1 (2016): 3. doi:10.1186/s12302-016-0070-0.

[4] Benbrook, Charles M. “Trends in glyphosate herbicide use in the United States and globally.” Environmental Sciences Europe 28,1 (2016): 3. doi:10.1186/s12302-016-0070-0.

[5] Gillezeau, Christina et al. “The evidence of human exposure to glyphosate: a review.” Environmental Health: A Global Access Science Source 18,1 (2019): 2. doi:10.1186/s12940-018-0435-5.

[6] Parvez, S et al. “Glyphosate exposure in pregnancy and shortened gestational length: a prospective Indiana birth cohort study.” Environmental Health: A Global Access Science Source 17,1 (2018): 23. doi:10.1186/s12940-018-0367-0.

[7] IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans Volume 112. “Some Organophosphate Insecticides and Herbicides.” 2017. http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Monographs/vol112/mono112-10.pdf. Accessed 18 Nov 2020.

[8] Benbrook, Charles M. “Trends in glyphosate herbicide use in the United States and globally.” Environmental Sciences Europe 28,1 (2016): 3. doi:10.1186/s12302-016-0070-0.

[9] Zanardi, María V et al. “Glyphosate-based herbicide induces hyperplastic ducts in the mammary gland of aging Wistar rats.” Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology 501 (2020): 110658. doi:10.1016/j.mce.2019.110658.

[10] Franke, Adrian A et al. “Pilot study on the urinary excretion of the glyphosate metabolite aminomethylphosphonic acid and breast cancer risk: The Multiethnic Cohort study.” Environmental Pollution 277 (2021): 116848. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2021.116848.

[11] Altamirano, Gabriela A. et al. “Postnatal exposure to a glyphosate-based herbicide modifies mammary gland growth and development in Wistar male rats.” Food and Chemical Toxicology 118 (2018): 111-118. doi:10.1016/j.fct.2018.05.011.

[12] Zanardi, María V et al. “Glyphosate-based herbicide induces hyperplastic ducts in the mammary gland of aging Wistar rats.” Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology 501 (2020): 110658. doi:10.1016/j.mce.2019.110658.

[13] Milesi et al. “Perinatal exposure to a gylphosate-based herbicide impairs female reproductive outcomes and induces second-generation adverse effects in Wistar rats.” Reproductive Toxicology 92 (2018): 2629-2643. doi:10.1007/s00204-018-2236-6.

[14] Mesnage, Robin, et al. “Evaluation of estrogen receptor alpha activation by glyphosate-based herbicide constituents.” Food and Chemical Toxicology 108 (2017): 30-42. doi:10.1016/j.fct.2017.07.025.

[15] Stur, Elaine, et al. “Glyphosate-based herbicides at low doses affect canonical pathways in estrogen positive and negative breast cancer cell lines.” PLOS One 14:7 (2019): e0219610. doi:/10.1371/journal.pone.0219610.

[16] Gillezeau, Christina, et al. “The evidence of human exposure to glysphosate: a review.”  Environmental Health 18 (2019): 2. doi:10.1186/s12940-018-0435-5.

[17] Parvez, S et al. “Glyphosate exposure in pregnancy and shortened gestational length: a prospective Indiana birth cohort study.” Environmental Health: A Global Access Science Source 17,1 (2018): 23. doi:10.1186/s12940-018-0367-0.

[18] Damalas, Christos A, and Spyridon D Koutroubas. “Farmers’ Exposure to Pesticides: Toxicity Types and Ways of Prevention.” Toxics 4,1 (2016): 1. doi:10.3390/toxics4010001.

[19] Alexander, Bruce H et al. “Biomonitoring of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid exposure and dose in farm families.” Environmental Health Perspectives 115, 3 (2007): 370-6. doi:10.1289/ehp.8869.

Monday, June 06, 2022

The War Will Not Be Forgotten

this is the fundamental patriachry paradigm of divide and conquer. . . 
The War Against the Unvaxxed Will Not Be Forgotten

Fomenting hatred is a tool of tyrants, and over the past two years, political leaders, agency heads, academics, medical professionals and media personalities alike have publicly encouraged hatred and violence and wished painful death upon anyone who didn’t want to be part of the medical experiment that is the COVID jabs.

In an eloquent Medium post, journalist Susan Dunham summarizes the lessons (hopefully) learned from hating and attacking the unvaccinated:1

“The mandates have let up, and both sides stumble back into something that looks like the old normal — except that there is a fresh and present injury done to the people we tried to break. And no one wants to talk about it.

Only weeks ago, it was the admitted goal of our own leaders to make life unlivable for the unvaccinated. And as a deputized collective, we force-multiplied that pain, taking the fight into our families, friendships, and workplaces. Today, we face the hard truth that none of it was justified — and, in doing that, uncover a precious lesson.

It was a quick slide from righteousness to cruelty, and however much we might blame our leaders for the push, we’re accountable for stepping into the trap despite better judgement.

We knew that waning immunity put vast numbers of the fully vaccinated on par with the shrinking minority of unvaccinated, yet we marked them for special persecution. We said they hadn’t ‘done the right thing’ by turning their bodies over to state care — even though we knew that principled opposition to such a thing is priceless in any circumstance ...

And so it was by the willful ignorance of science, civics, and politics that we squeezed the unvaccinated to the degree that we did ... [W]e cannot hold our heads high, as if believing we had logic, love, or truth on our side while we viciously wished death upon the unvaccinated. The best we can do is sit in the awareness of our rabid inhumanity for having cast so many aside ...

[B]etting against them has been a scathing embarrassment for many of us who’ve now learned that the mandates only had the power we gave them. It was not through quiet compliance that we avoided endless domination by pharmaceutical companies and medical checkpoints at every doorway.

It was thanks to the people we tried to tear down ... We took the bait by hating them, but their perseverance bought us the time to see we were wrong. It seems right now like the mandates will return, but this time there’s hope that more of us will see them for what they are: a rising authoritarianism that has no concern for our wellbeing.”

Friday, May 13, 2022

Surprising Health Benefits of Black Raspberries

Surprising Health Benefits of Black Raspberries | GreenMedInfo | Blog

Blackberries and black raspberries look much the same, but all raspberries have a hollow core once they are off the vine, while blackberries have a non-hollow white or green core. Black raspberries have double the anthocyanins and nearly three times the antioxidant levels of blackberries.

Blackberries are unique because they have almost three times the vitamin K level as both raspberry varieties (see Table 1 for the differences between black raspberries, blackberries and red raspberries).

Antioxidants have been shown to fight cancer, heart disease and age-related decline.[ii]  Anthocyanins, which give the black raspberry its rich dark purple color, protect against oxidative stress and are natural antioxidants.[iii] In addition to their antioxidant properties, black raspberries have chemopreventive, anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective[iv] effects and can lower the risk for breast[v] and colorectal cancers[vi] and cardiovascular diseases.[vii],[viii]

In the most recent scientific findings, researchers have discovered that black raspberries are also highly effective in fighting oral cancers, preventing diabetes, lowering blood pressure, managing weight, alleviating skin allergies and decreasing bone loss.


References 

[i] Berry Health Oregon State, Health Healing, Fact Sheets. https://berryhealth.fst.oregonstate.edu/health_healing/fact_sheets/ 

[ii] Raspberry Blackberry.com, WP Content, Black Raspberry Handouts. https://www.raspberryblackberry.com/wp-content/uploads/black_raspberry_handouts.pdf 

[iii] Mi-Hee Choi, Soon-Mi Shim, Gun-Hee Kim. Protective effect of black raspberry seed containing anthocyanins against oxidative damage to DNA, protein, and lipid. J Food Sci Technol. 2016 Feb ;53(2):1214-21. Epub 2015 Nov 15. PMID: 27162401 

[iv] Ma H, Johnson SL, Liu W, DaSilva NA, Meschwitz S, Dain JA, Seeram NP. Evaluation of Polyphenol Anthocyanin-Enriched Extracts of Blackberry, Black Raspberry, Blueberry, Cranberry, Red Raspberry, and Strawberry for Free Radical Scavenging, Reactive Carbonyl Species Trapping, Anti-Glycation, Anti-β-Amyloid Aggregation, and Microglial Neuroprotective Effects. Int J Mol Sci. 2018 Feb 3;19(2):461. doi: 10.3390/ijms19020461. PMID: 29401686; PMCID: PMC5855683. 

[v] Harini S Aiyer, Cidambi Srinivasan, Ramesh C Gupta. Dietary berries and ellagic acid diminish estrogen-mediated mammary tumorigenesis in ACI rats. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2007 Jul 16:1-6. Epub 2007 Jul 16. PMID: 18444155 

[vi] Pan Pan, Chad W Skae, Hsin Tzu Wang, Steven M Stirdivant, Matthew R Young, Kiyoko Oshima, Gary D Stoner, John F Lechner, Yi-Wen Huang, Li-Shu Wang. Black raspberries suppress colonic adenoma development in ApcMin/+ mice: relation to metabolite profiles. Carcinogenesis. 2015 Aug 5. Epub 2015 Aug 5. PMID: 26246425 

[vii] Han Saem Jeong, Sohyeon Kim, Soon Jun Hong, Seung Cheol Choi, Ji-Hyun Choi, Jong-Ho Kim, Chi-Yeon Park, Jae Young Cho, Tae-Bum Lee, Ji-Wung Kwon, Hyung Joon Joo, Jae Hyoung Park, Cheol Woong Yu, Do-Sun Lim. Black Raspberry Extract Increased Circulating Endothelial Progenitor Cells and Improved Arterial Stiffness in Patients with Metabolic Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Med Food. 2016 Apr ;19(4):346-52. Epub 2016 Feb 18. PMID: 26891216

Monday, May 09, 2022

Billions of GMO Mosquitoes in the Florida Keys

Florida Approves Release of Billions of GMO Mosquitoes - Sustainable Pulse

FDACS’ approval came despite unresolved public health and environmental concerns raised by scientists, public health experts and environmental groups about potential impacts of the release. The data from Florida’s 2021 field trial release of genetically engineered mosquitoes in the Florida Keys still has not been made public or reviewed by independent scientists.

“We should all be very concerned about an EPA that forgets its middle name, protection, with this approval. Our public trust is abused by Oxitec’s lack of scientific transparency and no independent scientific investigation from EPA to show this experimental insect will not create infinitely more problems than it will solve,” said Barry Wray, Director of Florida Keys Environmental Coalition. The EPA has behaved as if it is in partnership with Oxitec, disregarding the company’s history of deception and allowing a lobbyist to meet with former EPA Administrator Pruitt. “It is ethically repugnant to release these mosquitoes.”


Sunday, May 08, 2022

Fwd: The Liver

Organic Solutions
Volume 7 – Issue 3
The Liver 
 
Are you feeling sick?  

Do you have any physical illness that's been hanging around for ages?

If your answer to either of the above two questions is "yes", then I can say without reservation that you have a problem with your Liver.  I recommend at least one Liver Cleanse a year using my Liver Formula and Tea.  

Both of these support, and detoxify this vital organ.

The most important organ in the entire body is the Pituitary Gland which is located in the back central part of the Brain.  

This organ is responsible for keeping us fit and young, and is also the communications center that gives orders to all the other glands and pushes them to do their jobs.  

The Pituitary is the "Command Center" for the entire human body.  But, it is also a very neglected organ, and I refer you to my article on "The Brain" to learn how to keep it healthy and in shape.

The second most important organ in the body is the Liver which is located just behind the lower right hand side of your rib cage.  This is the organ that corrects and detoxifies all of the organs and glands in the body. It is the only organ that contributes to keeping the Pituitary in good shape.  

The two of them work hand in hand to "Establish & Organize" (the Pituitary) and "Detoxify & Correct" (the Liver).  

And even though the Pituitary may be the most neglected organ, the most abused is the Liver.  More junk food is thrown at a person's Liver on a daily basis than you would really care to confront.  

Soooooooo, when you keep consuming toxic laden foods day after day, the Liver gets to a point where it is just too busy trying to survive on its own, and no longer has the ability to correct all the other organs and glands in the body which is supposed to be its main job.  

The next thing you know you're sick with one or more of a thousand diseases.

All the Pesticides, Hormones, Steroids, and Genetic modifications found in our commercial food products nowadays is nothing short of criminal and it is obvious that the FDA, in its worship of Big Pharma and the Buck, has long ago betrayed its trust to the American people.  

They are truly guilty of Treason at the highest level.  Hundreds of thousands of people die each year because of their lack of responsibility, their suppression of the natural health movement, and their slavish devotion to the Giant Pharmaceutical companies and their own profits.

But where does the buck really stop???  

Wellllllllll, you may not want to hear this my friends, but it actually stops with you.  

You are responsible for the condition you are in regardless of "what has been done to you".  Isn't it time you grabbed the reins back and started taking charge of your own health?  

There's no sense in playing the role of "victim" and blaming the medical doctors for the physical condition you are in.  

Who decided to go to them in the first place???  

Yours in Knowledge, Health and Freedom,

Doc

Monday, May 02, 2022

10 Things to Eliminate for Better Health

10 Things to Eliminate for Better Health

Eliminate These 10 Things for a Healthier Life

1.Linoleic acid — Linoleic acid is the primary fat found in polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs), including vegetable/seed oils, and accounts for about 80% of the fat composition of vegetable oils. Omega-6 fats must be balanced with omega-3 fats in order to not be harmful, but this isn't the case for most Americans. Most of the omega-6 people eat, including seed oils, has been damaged and oxidized through processing.

"Most of this linoleic acid, when it oxidizes, it develops lipid hydroperoxides and then these rapidly degenerate into … oxidized linoleic acid metabolites," says Dr. Chris Knobbe, an ophthalmologist and the founder and president of the Cure AMD Foundation.3 According to Knobbe, OXLAMs (oxidized linoleic acid metabolites) are:

  • Cytotoxic and genotoxic
  • Mutagenic
  • Carcinogenic
  • Atherogenic
  • Thrombogenic

Metabolic dysfunction can also occur, while OXLAMs are toxic to the liver and are associated with inflammation, fibrosis and fatty liver disease in humans.4 Linoleic acid is found in virtually every processed food, including restaurant foods, sauces and salad dressings, so to eliminate it you'll need to eliminate most processed foods and restaurant foods from your diet — unless you can confirm that the chef only cooks with butter.

However, because animals are fed grains that are high in linoleic acid,5 it's also hidden in "healthy" foods like chicken and pork, which makes these meats a major source as well. Olive oil is another health food that can be a hidden source of linoleic acid, as it's often cut with cheaper seed oils.

2.Eating after dinner — The timing of your meals is nearly as important as the foods that make them up. Time restricted eating (TRE) is a simple powerful intervention that mimics the eating habits of our ancestors and restores your body to a more natural state that allows a whole host of metabolic benefits to occur.6

TRE involves limiting your eating window to six to eight hours per day instead of the more than 12-hour window most people use. Research shows, for instance, that TRE promotes insulin sensitivity and improves blood sugar management by increasing insulin-mediated glucose uptake rates,7 which is important for resolving Type 2 diabetes.

In another study, when 15 men at risk of Type 2 diabetes restricted their eating to even a nine-hour window, they lowered their mean fasting glucose, regardless of when the "eating window" commenced.8 Ideally, you'll want to stop eating for several hours before bedtime, then start your eating window in mid- to late morning after you wake up.

3.EMFs and cellphones — Most cellphones include a little-known warning that states to keep the phone a certain distance away from your body — usually 5 to 15 millimeters (mm) — to limit exposure to radiofrequency (RF) exposure to under the federal safety limit.9 If you carry your phone in your pocket or your bra, or hold it against your ear when you talk, you're violating this warning with unknown health consequences.

Devra Davis, Ph.D., founder and president of the Environmental Health Trust, has warned for years about the risks of cellphones in general but, in particular, about the risks to pregnant women and their unborn children, noting that prenatal animal studies have shown exposure to radiation from cellphones:10

  • Altered DNA
  • Altered brain metabolism
  • Compromised spinal cords
  • Affected learning abilities

Research conducted by the National Toxicology Program (NTP)11 also found "clear evidence" that exposure to cellphone radiation led to heart tumors in the male rats, along with "some evidence" that it caused brain and adrenal gland tumors in them.12

While most people won't want to eliminate their cellphone entirely, avoid carrying it on your body and keep it in airplane mode as much as possible. However, even in airplane mode it can still emit signals, which is why you should not sleep with it in your bedroom and should turn it off at night.

4.Artificial sweeteners — Consuming artificially sweetened foods and beverages leads to disruptions to metabolism13,14 and has been linked to increased appetite and cravings, as well as an increased risk of diabetes and other metabolic diseases.15,16

The artificial sweeteners acesulfame potassium and sucralose — brand name Splenda —may even interfere with your liver's detoxification process, as research found they inhibited the activity of P-glycoprotein (PGP), a "defense protein" that's important for protecting organisms against environmental toxins.17

Because PGP also plays a role in other body functions, including maintaining the blood-brain barrier, the researchers stressed the need for further research to determine how artificial sweeteners may be affecting other organs beyond the liver. A large-scale cohort study also found that people who consumed higher levels of artificial sweeteners, including aspartame, had higher risk of overall cancer compared to nonconsumers.18

Specifically, total cancer risks increased by 13% among artificial sweetener consumers, while the risk of breast cancer rose by 22% and the risk of obesity-related cancers increased up to 15%.19 In addition to their common usage in diet beverages and low-sugar snacks, be aware that artificial sweeteners are hidden in many products that might surprise you, including dairy products, ketchup, salad dressing, baked goods and medications.

5.Plastic food containers and bottles — If you're still storing your food in plastic containers or drinking from plastic bottles, switching to safe alternatives like glass, ceramic and stainless steel is a smart choice.

Microplastics, which are simply tiny pieces of plastic, are common in bottled water, for starters. When researchers with the department of chemistry at the State University of New York at Fredonia tested 259 bottles of water, they found microplastic contamination in 93% of them.20

It's unknown what health risks are posed by consuming these tiny plastic particles, but it is known that microplastics may act like sponges for contaminants including heavy metals, persistent organic pollutants, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) or pathogens, or could cause harm on a cellular or subcellular level.21

Plastics can also leach chemicals into your food and beverages. Phthalates are just one example of high-production volume chemicals used frequently as plasticizers in polyvinyl chloride (PVC) and other plastics, some of which are used in food packaging used by fast food and take-out restaurants. The risk may be even greater if you heat food in plastic or even let a plastic water bottle sit in the sun.

For instance, antimony, a toxic chemical used to manufacture polyethylene terephthalate (PET) plastics used for water bottles, is known to leach into water, and a study found that storing the bottles at higher temperatures increased the amount of leaching.22

6.Nonstick cookware — The convenience of a nonstick surface comes at a steep price, as chemicals used in their production persist in the environment, are contaminating water supplies and have been linked to developmental problems, cancer, liver damage, immune effects, thyroid problems and more.

Polyfluoroalkyl or perfluoroalkyl chemicals (PFASs), which include PFOA and PFOS, are estimated to be in the blood of more than 98% of Americans.23 While production of PFOA ended in 2015, DuPont and other companies have substituted similar chemicals in the production of nonstick cookware.

In May 2015, more than 200 scientists from 40 countries signed the Madrid Statement, which warns about the harms of PFAS chemicals and documents the following potential health effects of exposure:24

Liver toxicity

Disruption of lipid metabolism, and the immune and endocrine systems

Adverse neurobehavioral effects

Neonatal toxicity and death

Tumors in multiple organ systems

Testicular and kidney cancers

Liver malfunction

Hypothyroidism

High cholesterol

Ulcerative colitis

Reduced birth weight and size

Obesity

Decreased immune response to vaccines

Reduced hormone levels and delayed puberty

Healthier options include ceramic and enameled cast iron cookware, both of which are durable, easy to clean and completely inert, which means they won't release any harmful chemicals into your home.

7.Antibacterial soaps and detergents — The excessive and liberal use of antimicrobial products like household and industrial disinfectants, hand sanitizers and other antibacterial cleaners is raising the risk of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in the environment.

AMR has been declared one of the top 10 global public health threats to humanity,25 causing about 700,000 deaths globally every year.26 The use of antibacterial soap even causes shifts in the microbial composition of your skin, which could affect skin health.27

Antibacterial products may also contain triclosan, an antibacterial chemical and known endocrine disrupter. It's so widely used that it's estimated 75% of the U.S. population has been exposed, a concerning statistic since it is readily absorbed into human skin and oral mucosa, where it may affect immune responses, production of reactive oxygen species and cardiovascular functions.28 Reproductive and developmental effects have also been observed.

Unless you are in a hospital setting, avoid antibacterial soaps and detergents, including hand sanitizers and wipes, toothpaste, deodorants and laundry detergents.

8.Commercial cleaning products — Household cleaning products commonly release volatile organic compounds that may cause asthma and respiratory illnesses. One study found women who used chemical cleaning agents had accelerated decline in lung function, which may signal a risk to long-term respiratory health.29

Phthalates are also common in cleaning products, especially fragranced varieties. Studies show associations between exposure to phthalates in utero and the following health conditions:30

Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)

Other behavioral problems

Adverse cognitive development

Lower IQ

Poorer psychomotor development

Impaired social communication

The good news is that it's easy to replace chemical cleaners with a short list of basic ingredients, which can be used to make your own natural cleaning products:

Baking soda

White vinegar

Lemon juice

Hydrogen peroxide

Liquid castile soap

Organic essential oils (optional). Certain ones, including lavender and tea tree oil, have antibacterial qualities

Mixing bowls

Spray bottles

Microfiber cloths

9.Toxic personal care products — Personal care products often contain endocrine-disrupting chemicals, including phthalates and parabens, and toluene, a neurotoxicant. Very few chemicals on the market are tested for safety, but even those that aren't necessarily safe. Part of this is because safety testing is typically done on just one chemical at a time, and under laboratory conditions.

The way you're actually exposed to chemicals — in combination and under countless different real-world scenarios — may increase their toxicity exponentially. It's possible that use of personal care products and cosmetics may influence age at menopause,31 along with having a baby that's at increased risk of being small for gestational age.32

At least 11 chemicals and chemical families of concern have been uncovered that are commonly used in cosmetics. They include:33

Butylated hydroxyanisole/butylated hydroxytoluene
Coal tar dyes

Diethanolamine

Formaldehyde releasing preservatives

Parabens

Phthalates

1,4 dioxane

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons

Siloxanes

Talc/asbestos

Triclosan

To avoid exposure, simplify your routine and make your own personal care products using safe ingredients like coconut oil, mild soap and essential oils.

10.Your chair — Sitting is a pernicious negative influence on your health, as being sedentary for long periods of time each day appears to accelerate aging at the cellular level.34 Among close to 1,500 older women included in one study, those who sat the longest were, on average, eight years older, biologically speaking, than women who moved around more often.35

Separate research, published in the American Journal of Preventive Medicine, further found that sitting for more than three hours a day caused 3.8% of all-cause deaths in the 54 countries surveyed.36

Cutting your sitting time to less than three hours a day could increase your life expectancy by 0.2 years, the researchers concluded. More than 60% of people globally spend more than three hours a day sitting,37 so "sit less, move more" is a motto worth repeating. A simple way to do this is to replace your desk chair with a standup desk and walk each day as much as possible.

Remember, while I encourage you to work your way through each item on this list, you don't have to eliminate them all overnight. With each toxic exposure you remove from your life, you'll enjoy better health and receive renewed motivation to keep going on your quest toward reaching optimal health.



 Sources and References