Millions Are Disabled or Injured From the Jab?

Disabled or Injured From the Jab?

300K Excess Deaths, Millions of Injuries, Billions in Costs

Dowd and colleagues published their 2022 Vaccine Damage Project at their website, Phinance Technologies.5 It revealed the following estimated human and economic costs:6

Human Cost	Economic Cost
26.6 million injuries 1.36 million disabilities 300,000 excess deaths	Total: $147.8 billion Injuries: $89.9 billion Disabilities: $52.2 billion Excess deaths: $5.6 billion

To put this into perspective, John Leake writes on Courageous Discourse, "Note that this death count in one year is 5.2 times the number of men killed in 10 years of combat in Vietnam," adding:7

"Perhaps the most extraordinary thing about this state of affairs is that most Americans don't know it's happening. Every day, young people are dying from heart attacks, strokes, and seizures caused by COVID-19 vaccines. Most of their families and friends are led to believe that they just died — suddenly and unexpectedly — of acute conditions that were extremely rare in young people prior to 2021."

The report included data from employed individuals between the ages of 16 and 64, and categorized the impact into four broad groups:

1. No effect or asymptomatic
2. Mild to moderate outcome including a temporary or short-term, long-term or permanent injury
3. Severe outcome that leads to a disability
4. Extreme outcome leading to death

While group 1 was the largest, comprising an estimated 82% of the population, the authors pointed out that these groups are dynamic, and individuals in one group could move into another, particularly in the case of progressing from no or minor injury to severe injury, such as we've seen with elite athletes suddenly dropping dead on the field:8

"While these groupings characterize different levels of damage from the inoculations, they are not static and could interact with each other. For instance, there might be individuals who had no visible effects after vaccination but nonetheless could still be impacted from the inoculations and could therefore be represented in the sub-group of injured individuals.

In a similar way, individuals with mild injuries from the inoculations could, over time, develop severe injuries to the extent of being disabled, or an extreme outcome such as death. The likely path of outcomes would be from injury to disability to death.

We need to consider, however, that to a lesser extent there could be individuals who suffer extreme outcomes when they had previously only experienced mild injuries until then. We can relate this with the anecdotes of otherwise healthy athletes suffering heart attacks during sports competitions at an alarming rate since the 2021 inoculations."

• 1 Rumble February 27, 2023, 1:00
• 2 Bitchute, Tucker Carlson Interviews Ed Dowd February 25, 2023, 10:00
• 3, 7, 21, 23 Substack, Courageous Discourse March 29, 2023
• 4, 5, 8, 9 Phinance Technologies, The Vaccine Damage Project March 2023
• 6 Zero Hedge March 28, 2023
• 10 Phinance Technologies, US absence rates and lost worktime data March 2023
• 11 Twitter, Edward Dowd March 28, 2023
• 12 medRxiv March 22, 2023
• 13 medRxiv March 22, 2023, Results
• 14 Substack, Maryanne Demasi, reports March 28, 2023
• 15 Twitter, Dystopian Down Under March 28, 2023
• 16, 19, 20 Umbrella News March 28, 2023
• 17 Western Australian Vaccine Safety Surveillance Report 2021, Page 29
• 18 Western Australian Vaccine Safety Surveillance Report 2021, Page 8
• 22 Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice March 26, 2023, Lessons Learned

 

Switzerland C0V!D-19 “vacc!nes” does not justify “vacc!nat!0n” in any cohort

Switzerland, a non-aligned nation (not NATO, EU, or BRICS) is generally considered the global hub of the pharmaceutical industry. The Government of Switzerland coming out with this position is a clear recognition that objective scientific analysis of the risk/benefit ratio of COVID-19 “vaccines” does not justify “vaccination” in any cohort. Note that the Swiss position is that physicians can prescribe, but will need to carry the risk of liability in the case of adverse events - the exact opposite position of the US HHS position. This clearly demonstrates that this issue has become politicized in the USA, and that the objectivity of HHS decision making has been compromised. This decision is based in part on the widespread natural immunity which has developed in Switzerland, something which was long denied by the US Government, US corporate media and US information technology (social media) companies and their NGO surrogates.

No positive risk-benefit ratio

The remarks on “Adverse Vaccination Symptoms” (UIE) are also piquant:

According to the current state of knowledge, the risk of severe UIE with a recommended vaccination is much lower than the risk of a complication from Covid-19, against which the vaccination protects. The benefit of the vaccination administered according to the recommendation therefore outweighs the possible risks.

In the case of the valid non-recommendation, this essentially means that there is no longer a positive benefit-risk ratio for any Covid vaccination.

Liability: the federal government is out, doctors have a duty

The new recommendations also have consequences for liability. This is what the BAG document on the Covid vaccination strategy (as of November 29th, 2022) says:

Compensation by the federal government to injured persons for vaccination damage can only be considered for vaccinations if they were officially recommended or ordered (see Art. 64 EpG).

However, the federal government only stepped in if the damage was not covered by the vaccine manufacturer, the person vaccinating or an insurance company. The person vaccinating – i.e. generally the doctor – can be held liable if he has breached his duty of care. In this context, it is pointed out that the same rules regarding patient information apply to the Covid vaccination as to all other vaccinations.

The fact is, however, that very few doctors are likely to have informed their patients correctly about all the risks and side effects and the limited effectiveness of the Covid vaccinations. The off-label use of vaccines (not unusual for Covid vaccinations, for example the bivalent mRNA vaccines in Switzerland are not approved as first vaccinations, not as a booster for people under the age of 18 and not as a fifth vaccination) must be discussed become. For doctors, the justification of vaccinations is becoming more difficult due to the changed recommendations, according to a BAG document on liability issues:

If the doctor treating you bases his/her choice or prescription on the vaccination recommendations of the BAG, he/she can prove that he/she has observed the recognized rules of medical and pharmaceutical sciences and has therefore complied with the duty of care under the law on medicinal products.

https://www.bag.admin.ch/bag/de/home/krankheiten/ausbrueche-epidemien-pandemien/aktuelle-ausbrueche-epidemien/novel-cov/information-fuer-die-aerzteschaft/covid-19-impfung.html

 

Noble Lie attributed to Socrates

The Noble Lie is a concept attributed to Socrates and discussed in Book III of Plato’s “The Republic”, which holds that the use of noble lies by the ruling caste is necessary to uphold social cohesion within an ideal society (The Republic). In many ways, this is the root of the internal justification employed by the various bureaucrat/administrative state actors that have authorized and funded (using taxpayer funds) the fearporn and pro-vax propaganda campaigns. Few recognize that the Noble Lie is one component of a core Platonic myth designed to justify a permanent class system, with the allegory of the cave being another. Both are derived from the Myth of Three Metals.

The Three Metals myth posits that Mother Nature invented all human beings and mixed different metals—gold, silver, bronze or iron—into their characters. This is basically Plato’s justification for a permanent social caste structure of rulers (overlords) and ruled. Rulers have gold in their characters, workers have iron, and so on for all different classes and professions. Plato posits that this myth will make it easier to rule an ideal republic since 1) everyone will think that their social class is an extension of their inner character, and 2) everyone will know they have a common mother so they will treat each other peacefully. In such an “ideal” republic, inspired wise philosopher-kings, with characters of gold, will rule in a benevolent manner (noblesse oblige) and will lie to the ruled when necessary to maintain social order and the natural social structure (based on one’s metal content, or “mettle”).

In short, based on these assimulated social theories which trace to antiquity, we were all lied to throughout the COVIDcrisis BECAUSE the ruling caste was philosophically justified in doing so. Otherwise, allowing free speech would jeopardize the social structure by causing hesitancy or concerns about the governmental and WHO public health policies (including mandated reliance on an experimental vaccine). And our Golden overlords were justified in doing so because their very characters are fashioned from gold, while ours contain silver, bronze or iron. 

Bluntly, the Platonic thesis is that propaganda emanating from the ruling caste is necessary and required to maintain social order. In the 21st century, the term “propaganda” has become curiously quaint and anachronistic as the associated underpinning psychologic science and technology have advanced. Terms more accurately reflecting the current state-of-the-art include fifth generation warfare, nudge theory, psy-ops, and the censorship-industrial complex

Fluoride Linked to Brain Harm

Health Officials Delayed Report Linking Fluoride to Brain Harm

NTP Report — 52 of 55 Studies Link Fluoride to Lower IQ

So, what did the NTP report11 reveal about fluoride's neurotoxicity? Out of 55 studies included in the review, 52 found that increased fluoride exposure was associated with decreases in child IQ.

"Our meta-analysis confirms results of previous meta-analyses and extends them by including newer, more precise studies … The data support a consistent inverse association between fluoride exposure and children's IQ," the report found.12 While some have stated that the data only apply to water fluoride concentrations above those commonly found in U.S. drinking water, NTP didn't agree, stating:13

"We do not agree with this comment … our assessment considers fluoride exposures from all sources, not just water … because fluoride is also found in certain foods, dental products, some pharmaceuticals, and other sources … Even in the optimally fluoridated cities … individual exposure levels … suggest widely varying total exposures from water combined with fluoride from other sources.

… We have no basis on which to state that our findings are not relevant to some children or pregnant people in the United States … Several of the highest quality studies showing lower IQs in children were done in optimally fluoridated (0.7 mg/L) areas…many urinary fluoride measurements exceed those that would be expected from consuming water that contains fluoride at 1.5 mg/L."

No Safe Level of Fluoride in Water

The report also identified a drop of about seven IQ points over a fluoride range of 0.2 to 1.5 mg/L, which a peer reviewer described as "substantial … That's a big deal."14 The meta-analysis noted that no safe exposure level could be confirmed, including exposure to fluoride levels found in artificially fluoridated water.15 The next hearing for FAN's lawsuit against the EPA is set for April 11, 2023.16

FAN obtained documents via the Freedom of Information Act that further showed dental groups' attempts to "water down the report." FAN explained:17

"When the NTP held firm, these agencies got HHS Assistant Administrator Rachel Levine to block its release. Only one historical example exists of an NTP report being blocked from release, a report on the carcinogenicity of asbestos-contaminated talc.

Talc industry groups conducted an aggressive lobbying campaign, enlisting friendly congresspeople to intervene. FAN was able to force today's release of the NTP report by using leverage from the ongoing lawsuit against the EPA.

Fluoridation defenders have falsely claimed draft versions of the report had been 'rejected' by a National Academies committee. In fact, the committee recommended that NTP clarify their methods and reasoning for reaching their conclusions because the issue was considered so contentious. The NTP has done that in the report …

There is now little question that a large body of scientific evidence supports a conclusion that fluoride can lower child's IQ, including at exposure levels from fluoridated water … With the release of this report, dental interests may have to rethink their denial of the evidence that fluoridation can reduce children's IQ."

97% of Western Europe Has Rejected Water Fluoridation

If the U.S. got it wrong about water fluoridation after declaring it a top public health achievement, it makes you wonder what else they're wrong about. And it's important to understand that water fluoridation is not the norm worldwide. In fact, 97% of people living in western Europe drink nonfluoridated water, including those in:18

Austria	Belgium	Denmark
Finland	France	Germany
Greece	Iceland	Italy
Luxembourg	Netherlands	Northern Ireland
Norway	Portugal	Scotland
Sweden	Switzerland

Fluoride in drinking water is an industrial waste product from the phosphate fertilizer industry.19 More than 300 studies have shown fluoride's toxic effects on the brain,20 including 2006 National Research Council review that suggested fluoride exposure may be associated with brain damage, endocrine system disruption and bone cancer.21

In 2012, Harvard researchers also revealed that children living in high-fluoride areas had significantly lower IQ scores than those who lived in low-fluoride areas22 and suggested high fluoride exposure may have an adverse effect on children's neurodevelopment.

A study of Mexican women and children also raised concern, showing that higher exposure to fluoride while in utero is associated with lower scores on tests of cognitive function in childhood, both at the age of 4 and 6 to 12 years.23

Each 0.5 milligram per liter increase in pregnant women's fluoride levels was associated with a reduction of 3.15 and 2.5 points on the children's scores on the General Cognitive Index (GCI) of the McCarthy Scales of Children's Abilities and the Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence (WASI), respectively.

Fluorosilicic acid, which is the fluoride chemical added to drinking water, may also be contaminated with additional harmful compounds, including lead and arsenic. Children, in particular, are at risk from ingesting fluoride, but they are exposed to the same levels in drinking water as adults. According to Steven Gilbert, Ph.D., founder and director of the Institute of Neurotoxicology and Neurological Disorders:24

"From the 1950s the PHS [Public Health Service] recommendation for the concentration of fluoridated water has been 1.0 mg/L (milligrams per liter or ppm) for most of the U.S., with a range of 0.7 to 1.2 mg/L. In 2015, this recommendation was lowered to 0.7 mg/L to reduce the toxic side effects of fluoride ingestion while attempting to maintain its beneficial effects.

For toxicological assessment, ingested doses are typically adjusted by body weight. Kids eat more, breathe more, and drink more than adults on a body weight basis so they will have higher fluoride doses than adults. Moreover, child organ systems such as the brain and bones are still developing, making them more vulnerable to the toxic effects of fluoride."

Hopefully, now that the NTP review has been released, the truth about water fluoridation's toxicity will come out, and the archaic practice can be ended in the U.S. and worldwide.

 Sources and References

• 1 U.S. CDC April 23, 2015
• 2 Slate February 11, 2013
• 3, 12, 13, 14 Pr Newswire March 16, 2023
• 4 Fluoride Action Network, Trial Fact Sheet
• 5 Fluoride Action Network, TSCA Trial
• 6 FluorideAlert.org June 8, 2021
• 7 FluorideAlert.org, The TSCA Fluoride Trial, 2016-Present, Up to December 2021
• 8 FluorideAlert.org, The National Toxicology Program, Updated March 2023
• 9 FluorideAlert.org February 23, 2023
• 10 Capital & Main March 14, 2023
• 11 NTP Monograph on the State of the Science Concerning Fluoride Exposure and Neurodevelopmental and Cognitive Health Effects [...] September 2022
• 15, 17 PR Newswire March 15, 2023
• 16 FluorideAlert.org, The TSCA Fluoride Trial, 2016-Present
• 18 FluorideAlert.org May 2019
• 19 Origins, Toxic Treatment: Fluoride’s Transformation From Industrial Waste to Public Health Miracle
• 20 FAN, Studies on Fluoride
• 21 NRC 2006
• 22 Environmental Health Perspectives October 2012, Volume 120, Issue 10
• 23 Environmental Health Perspectives September 2017, Volume 125, Issue 9
• 24 Toxipedia, Connecting the Dots, Fluoride Ingestion, Page 3

Strawberries Don't Taste Good Anymore?

Is This Why Strawberries Don't Taste Good Anymore?

As more people recognize the need to steer clear of pesticides, they are growing their own produce in potted gardens and their backyards. Although the demand for organic seeds has grown, High Mowing Organic Seeds is one of the only companies that produces organic seeds from organically grown plants. Most seed companies do not grow their own seeds, and while you may grow the plants organically, the seeds may not have organic roots.

Tom Stearns is the owner and founder of High Mowing Organic Seeds, which he started as a hobby in 1996. By the third year, he had sold $18,000 worth of seeds and $34,000 in the fourth year. The growing demand required that Stearns turn his hobby into a business that quickly became a half-million-dollar company.

Stearns was interviewed by Growing a Greener World in 2018,28 during which he talked about how important choosing organic seeds is to create a healthy dietary plan. While there are rules regarding chemical usage for commercial food crops, the rules are more relaxed when it comes to growing conventional seeds, which technically aren't a food product:29

“When you’re growing food conventionally, there are rules about all the different chemicals you can use and not use. When you’re growing seeds conventionally, there’s also rules, but there are a lot more chemicals that are allowed.

So, seed crops get sprayed with a lot of things, because it’s not a food crop, so it’s not going to translate into that risk for people, but of course it’s still poisons in the environment. So, when you grow seeds organically, you don’t have those poisons, and it’s a major reduction of them compared to the conventional comparison.”

Another eye-opening fact revealed by Stearns is that 95% of the acreage of organic vegetable farms is planted with conventional seeds. This isn’t necessarily by choice, as the organic seed industry is still in its infancy, which means there isn’t always enough to go around, or the correct varieties aren’t always available.

In fact, half the vegetables grown today have no commercial sources — you have to get them through seed trades.30 High Mowing Organic Seeds is trying to bring more organic seed varieties to organic farmers, which they say makes a major difference compared to using conventional seeds.

If you garden, seeking out high-quality organic seeds will help you produce the most robust plants and healthiest food. Another alternative, however, is to save seeds from your own plants. When you save seed from your own best-performing plants, on your land and in your own ecosystem, you gradually develop varieties better adapted to your own soil, climate and growing conditions.

Large seed suppliers rarely "rogue" the fields to pull out inferior or off-type plants, so the open-pollinated seeds they sell have inferior specimens in the mix. High Mowing is one of the rare seed companies that do this, but you can also select your own seed for uniformity and quality.

You can control the gene pool for optimal germination, ripening time, flavor, storage, disease resistance and color. After a few seasons, more and more of your plants will have all your personally selected traits.

Sources and References

• 1, 11 Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2023;71(8)
• 2 Organic Consumers Association, May 24, 2017
• 3 International Agency for Research on Cancer, IARC Monograph on Glyphosate
• 4 The Lancet Oncology, 2015;16(5)
• 5 Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 2020;18(3)
• 6 Environmental Pollution, 2020;256(113334)
• 7 Journal of Biological Physics and Chemistry January 2015, 15(3)
• 8 CDC, June 2022
• 9 UnSpun, July 9, 2022
• 10, 12 Chemosphere, 2003;52(5)
• 13, 14 ZME Science, March 2, 2023
• 15 WineCooler, January 26, 2017
• 16 Medicinal Plants, 2019 doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-31269-5_15
• 17 PNAS, 2022; 119 (7)t
• 18, 20 The New York Post, February 27, 2021
• 19 The Land Report, January 11, 2021
• 21 Food Safety News, Amos Miller
• 22 David Gumpert, July 10, 2021
• 23 David Gumpert, October 23, 2016
• 24 Rebel News, August 16, 2022 para 5 & 7
• 25 YouTube, The Joe Rogan Experience November 4, 2022, 0:10
• 26 White Oak Pastures, FAQs, What is regenerative farming?
• 27 White Oak Pasture, August 8, 2022
• 28 YouTube, November 10, 2018 Min 9:27 – 10:20
• 29 YouTube, November 10, 2018
• 30 Almanac, February 27, 2023

Fwd: 🟠 Welcome to Week 11

I can get all these last week posts for you too

Sent from my iPhone 11+max :-D))

Begin forwarded message:

From: James at Exodus 90 <freedom@exodus90.com>
Date: March 20, 2023 at 7:30:16 AM EDT
To: stars2man@icloud.com
Subject: 🟠  Welcome to Week 11
Reply-To: support@exodus90.com



You are in the rugged, mountainous desert at the base of Mount Sinai. In this week's Scripture, the Israelites demonstrate human weakness

Week 11 E. Rafael,   You are in the rugged, mountainous desert at the base of Mount Sinai. In this week's Scripture, the Israelites demonstrate human weakness. They show how easy it is to fall back into old habits. They reveal to us the need to actively and continuously pursue the Lord. The Levites demonstrate that courageous fidelity to the Lord is possible even in a world of debauchery. The Lord reveals something greater than either. He shows the Israelites and us that he will always remain faithful to his covenant people, even when they (we) fail him. Listen closely to the Word in the Scriptures this week. Listen as he reveals his faithful love for you.   E. Rafael's Action Items 1. Follow Christ. Remember who is leading you, and remain reliant on him in prayer. Jesus has brought you this far and he will continue to lead you to the promised land. If you begin to think you have done this work on your own, he may allow you to see a glimpse of what you are capable of without him. That is, he may allow you to wander back to Egypt. Stay at the base of Mount Sinai, remaining reliant on the Lord.   Just as many of the Israelites lost patience with Moses as he remained forty days atop Mount Sinai, so you may be losing patience with some aspects of this spiritual exercise. You may have lost patience with prayer (thinking that the Lord is not speaking to you), with the difficulty of the ascetic practices, or with your fraternity brothers. Yet, it is exactly these things that have brought you to Week 11. Be patient, trust, and continue to surrender control. God will bring forth the freedom you seek.   2. Make a good confession before Easter. Although we've had this as an action item before, many spiritual guides suggest that the faithful make a good confession at least once a month. Don't let yourself or your sins get in the way of your freedom. Make a good confession this week, or at least before Easter. This is an important practice for living a life of freedom.   3. Check in with and pray for your anchor. After weeks of making a nightly examination, you have begun to know yourself better. Are you tempted to cut a corner, skip a reflection, avoid time with God in prayer, or even to completely turn back to the slavery you left behind? Check in with your anchor and share how you're doing. Even if you already checked in with him today, if you are concerned that you may fall, check in with your anchor again. It is far better to contact him in a moment of temptation than to have to explain to the whole fraternity why you didn't contact him, after you've fallen. Make sure to pray for him and for all your fraternity. Ask them to pray for you as well.   4. Do something to honor your wife (or someone else). If you have done a good job cultivating joy through gratitude and hope throughout these weeks, share that joy with your wife (if applicable, or another close family member or friend). Help them to see the fruit of your exodus.     Have a great week and pray for the freedom for all men in Exodus, just as they are praying for you.   Pray with Today's Reading and Reflection Your Exodus Brother,     Who will you invite? Exodus, 2451 Broadway St, Fort Wayne, Indiana 46807 Manage preferences