C0V!D Patients Died for Profit

How COVID Patients Died for Profit

By May 2020, it had become apparent that the standard practice of putting COVID-19 patients on mechanical ventilation with ventilators was a death sentence.1 As early as April 9, 2020, Business Insider reported2 that 80% of COVID-19 patients in New York City who were placed on ventilators died, which caused a number of doctors to question their use.

The Associated Press3 also publicized similar reports from China and the U.K. A U.K. report put the figure at 66%, while a small study from Wuhan, China, put the ratio of deaths at 86%. Data presented by attorney Thomas Renz in 2021 showed that in Texas hospitals, 84.9% of patients died after more than 96 hours on a ventilator.4

The lowest figure I've seen is 50%.5 So, somewhere between 50% and 86% of all ventilated COVID patients died. Compare that to historical prepandemic ratios, where 30% to 40% of ventilated patients died.

Making matters worse, many of the doctors treating these patients were not trained in critical care. One of the "doctors" on the COVID floor was a dentist. Residents (medical students) were also relied on, even though they were not properly trained in how to safely ventilate, and were unfamiliar with the potent drugs used.

At the time, Olszewski blamed financial incentives for turning the hospital into a killing field. Elmhurst, a public hospital, received $29,000 extra for a COVID-19 patient receiving ventilation, over and above other treatments, she said.

If Elmhurst had infection control in mind when ventilating patients, they certainly didn't follow through, as COVID-positive and negative patients were comingled — a strategy Olszewski suspected was intended to drive up the COVID case and mortality numbers.

Others have also highlighted the role of financial incentives. In early April 2020, Minnesota family physician and state Sen. Scott Jensen explained:15

"Medicare has determined that if you have a COVID-19 admission to the hospital you'll get paid $13,000. If that COVID-19 patient goes on a ventilator, you get $39,000; three times as much."

Former CDC director Robert Redfield also admitted that financial policies may indeed have resulted in artificially elevated hospitalization rates and death toll statistics. As reported August 1, 2020, by the Washington Examiner:16

"… Redfield agreed that some hospitals have a monetary incentive to overcount coronavirus deaths … 'I think you're correct in that we've seen this in other disease processes, too.

Really, in the HIV epidemic, somebody may have a heart attack but also have HIV — the hospital would prefer the [classification] for HIV because there's greater reimbursement,' Redfield said17 during a House panel hearing … when asked by Rep. Blaine Luetkemeyer about potential 'perverse incentives.' Redfield continued: 'So, I do think there's some reality to that …"

In addition to receiving exorbitant payments for COVID admissions and putting patients on a ventilator, hospitals are also paid extra for:18

• COVID testing for all patients
• COVID diagnoses
• Use of remdesivir
• COVID deaths

Sources and References

• 1 Medscape April 6, 2020
• 2 Business Insider April 9, 2020
• 3 The Associated Press April 8, 2020
• 4, 18, 19 Citizens Journal December 20, 2021
• 5, 12 Wall Street Journal December 20, 2020
• 6, 7 Newswise April 23, 2020
• 8 The Dossier Substack September 30, 2020
• 9 WHO Clinical Management of Severe COVID-19
• 10 WHO Infection Prevention and Control for COVID
• 11 NBC News April 30, 2020
• 13, 20 Substack Popular Rationalism January 23, 2023
• 14 YouTube Perspectives on the Pandemic 2020
• 15 Fox News April 9, 2020
• 16 Washington Examiner August 1, 2020
• 17 Breitbart July 31, 2020

The Most Important Topics of Our Time

The Most Important Topics of Our Time

One of the most egregious crimes against humanity occurred October 20, 2022, when the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) unanimously (15-0) voted to add unlicensed COVID-19 shots to the U.S. childhood, adolescent and adult vaccine schedules.5

By adding the shots to the vaccine schedule, the CDC is securing Pfizer's and Moderna's permanent liability shield so that no one can sue them for damages for injuries and deaths occurring as a result of the shots. It also opens the door for states to mandate the jab for school children.

The very same day, Pfizer announced it will raise the price on its COVID jab by about 400%,6 from $307 per jab to somewhere between $110 and $130 once the current U.S. purchase program expires.

Pfizer has forecasted expected revenues into the foreseeable future and they're not going to let real-world market demands dictate its revenue stream. Instead, they're going to make up the difference through price hikes which, ultimately, will be paid by government and insurance companies

 Sources and References

• 1 National Review June 14, 2017
• 2 Wayback Machine, WHO Pandemic Preparedness captured September 2, 2009 (PDF)
• 3 The BMJ 2010;340:c2912
• 4 Wayback Machine, WHO Pandemic Preparedness captured May 1, 2009 (PDF)
• 5 Rumble October 20, 2022
• 6 Daily Wire October 21, 2022
• 7 Reuters October 20, 2022
• 8 New York Times August 31, 2022 (Archived)
• 9 JAMA. 2000;284(4):483-485
• 10 Hopkins Medicine May 3, 2016
• 11 NIH. Medical Error. July 4, 2022
• 12 Food is Medicine Coalition
• 13 Health.gov Conference on Hunger, Nutrition and Health
• 14 Coreysdigs.com November 22, 2022
• 15 Illinois Blockchain and Distributed Ledger Task Force 2018
• 16 Food Compass
• 17 Tufts Now October 14, 2021
• 18 Twitter Nina Teicholz July 17, 2022
• 19 NPR April 8, 2022
• 20 National Interest April 11, 2022
• 21 Bloomberg March 22, 2022
• 22 NY Fed launches 12-week CBDC pilot program with major banks Nov 15, 2022
• 23 Diabetes 1982 Nov; 31(11): 957-963
• 24 N Engl J Med 1990; 322:223-228
• 25 Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2005, 37, 2047–2063
• 26 Frontiers in Physiology 2019; 10: 533
• 27 Int J Mol Sci June 2018; 19(6): 1672
• 28 Am J. Physiol Cell Physiol March 1, 2020; 318(3): c536-c541
• 29 Physiology February 5, 2020 DOI: 10.1152/physiol.00034.2019
• 30 Indian J. Exp Biol. May 1996; 34(5): 391-402
• 31 Frontiers in Pharmacology August 21, 2020 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2020.01220
• 32 Allergy Research Group, Melatonin, the Antioxidant Recycler
• 33 Cell Death & Disease 2019; 10 article number 317
• 34 Oncotarget June 13, 2017; 8(24): 39896–39921

Alzheimer's had universally high levels of Aluminum. . .

I watched a Holocaust Documentary on PBS this weekend.  Yes Aluminum and Fluoride were tested by Hitler to determine minimum concentrations to enable industry to poison everyone without tracking it, and guarantee their results. . . OH you believed all the Fake News that Hitler was only killing people, so why use IBM to number and track all this data. . . ?  Oh so he could know his body count, NOT!

Of course, I already found the Alcoa data is the FDA Achieves! Thank God for Public Records.

Yes this getting clear: https://rumble.com/v261e7m-our-birthright.html

Remember the plastic around aluminum is atoms thin so touching a new beer can twice and your touching aluminum. . . that dissolves in your hands.

And more research is coming out:  

Billionaires meet in secret to discuss the 'Over-populated world'

Clandestine meetings, involving some of the richest people in the world, to discuss how the world is over-populated sounds like a good plot line for a new book or film, doesn't it? Some of the most powerful people in the world don't sit around a table discussing how to change the future of the planet. That's just a conspiracy theory.

Except it isn't.

The first record of the self-proclaimed 'Good Club' was in 2009 when leaked details were reported on by the Times and the Guardian. And, as with all good conspiracy theories, the MSM were shocked. ABC News said "there remain as many questions about the meeting's details as there are about the logistics behind its organization. How did some of the world's most public figures coordinate their schedules, travel, and security with no one in media knowing about it?"

Hmm, I wonder.

Participants to the secret meeting, funded and attended by Bill Gates, included:

• George Soros

• Warren Buffett
• David Rockefeller
• Ted Turner (Founded CNN)
• Eli Broad

• Edythe Broad

• Michael Bloomberg

• Oprah Winfrey

• Peter Peterson

• Julian Robertson Jr

• John Morgridge (CEO of Cisco)

• Tashia Morgridge

• Patty Stonesifer

The meeting was held at the home of Sir Paul Nurse, in Manhattan on 5 May 2009. Apparently he was away at the time but allowed the club to use his house.

Odd, I'd want to be home if the richest people in the world were coming over for tea.

Sir Nurse is a British Nobel prize biochemist and, at the time, was president of the Rockefeller University. He was awarded the Nobel Prize for his joint discovery of protein molecules that control the division of cells in the cell cycle. A year later, Nurse became President of the Royal Society in the UK.

He is currently the Chief Executive and Director of the Francis Crick Institute. The Institute works closely with a number of organisations, including the Wellcome Trust and Imperial College London.  (Coincidentally, the meeting occurred just as the Swine Flu crisis was kicking off and Mr. Gates was being advised by Neil Ferguson from Imperial College. Yes, that Neil Ferguson. Neil estimated that 65,000 people in the UK would die from Swine flu but in the end it only claimed 457 lives.)

The Crick Institute is named after Francis Crick, one of the scientists that discovered DNA. It has a brand new building in London, described as the "altar to biomedical science" and is Europe's largest biomedical research centre.In this culture of 'wokeness', I'm surprised that they can still call it the Crick Institute after Francis' eugenicist views. Mr. Crick thought the Nazis had given eugenics "a bad name". And in the same letter, from 1971, he added "I think it is time something is done to make it [eugenics] respectable again".

Crick also thought that it is likely that "more than half the difference between the average IQ of American whites and Negroes is due to genetic reasons, and will not be eliminated by any foreseeable change in the environment." He also said "evidence for the equality of different races did not really exist. In fact, what little evidence there was suggested racial difference."

In another letter in 1970, Crick suggested that in an attempt to solve the problem of people who are poorly endowed genetically, "sterilization is the only answer and I would do this by bribery."

Anyway, I got distracted by eugenics, back to the meeting.

It was considered so secret that the billionaires' aides were told they were at "security briefings". Apparently, they didn't want to be seen as a global cabal, so discretion was of upmost importance.

Each participant was given 15 minutes to talk and then they discussed an "umbrella cause" that could harness all their interests. A number of issues were discussed but "taking their cue from Gates they agreed that overpopulation was a priority". 

• Another guest said there was "nothing as crude as a vote" but a consensus emerged that they would back a strategy in which population growth would be tackled as a potentially disastrous environmental, social and industrial threat. "This is something so nightmarish that everyone in this group agreed it needs big-brain answers," said the guest. "They need to be independent of government agencies, which are unable to head off the disaster we all see looming."

So, billionaires, sitting around a table discussing their view that there are and will be too many people on the Earth, is not a conspiracy theory. And of course we should be concerned. Their neo-Malthusian views are going to be a major problem for the world in the near future (well, unless you are super rich).

With such incredible wealth and with such amazing advancement in technology, the 'Good Club' should be feared. They can pretty much do anything they want and a great example of this is Bill Gates planning to block out the sun by spraying dust into the atmosphere.

For all we know they could all be a bunch of psychopaths or sociopaths (to get to the positions they have means it is quite likely). What if they are and believe the world is over-populated? It is a worrying thought. Surely, if all they were doing was planning on how to save the world, they would be transparent and encourage everyone to help them on their mission.

Perhaps they are part of a group of disparate thinkers that want humans to disappear all together? A recent "The Atlantic" article highlights this issue being discussed by an increasing number of people :

From Silicon Valley boardrooms to rural communes to academic philosophy departments, a seemingly inconceivable idea is being seriously discussed: that the end of humanity's reign on Earth is imminent, and that we should welcome it. The revolt against humanity is still new enough to appear outlandish, but it has already spread beyond the fringes of the intellectual world, and in the coming years and decades it has the potential to transform politics and society in profound ways.

This is called Anthropocene anti-humanism, "inspired by revulsion at humanity's destruction of the natural environment". For all we know, these billionaires could be part of this cult and influencing policies based on these views.

In the 21st century, Anthropocene anti-humanism offers a much more radical response to a much deeper ecological crisis. It says that our self-destruction is now inevitable, and that we should welcome it as a sentence we have justly passed on ourselves. Some anti-humanist thinkers look forward to the extinction of our species, while others predict that even if some people survive the coming environmental apocalypse, civilization as a whole is doomed. Like all truly radical movements, Anthropocene anti-humanism begins not with a political program but with a philosophical idea. It is a rejection of humanity's traditional role as Earth's protagonist, the most important being in creation.

Or, on the opposite end of the spectrum is transhumanism. Perhaps they belong to this ideology.

Transhumanism, by contrast, glorifies some of the very things that anti-humanism decries—scientific and technological progress, the supremacy of reason. But it believes that the only way forward for humanity is to create new forms of intelligent life that will no longer be Homo sapiens. Some transhumanists believe that genetic engineering and nanotechnology will allow us to alter our brains and bodies so profoundly that we will escape human limitations such as mortality and confinement to a physical body. Others await, with hope or trepidation, the invention of artificial intelligence infinitely superior to our own. These beings will demote humanity to the rank we assign to animals—unless they decide that their goals are better served by wiping us out completely.

The problem is, by keeping their meeting and agenda secret, we can only hope that they want to act in everyone's interest. Personally, I would rather take a more cautious approach and think that they are psychopaths planning the worst, until proved otherwise. Especially when there is a growing number of people who think like this:

• The revolt against humanity has a great future ahead of it because it appeals to people who are at once committed to science and reason yet yearn for the clarity and purpose of an absolute moral imperative. It says that we can move the planet, maybe even the universe, in the direction of the good, on one condition—that we forfeit our own existence as a species. Both [anti-humanists and transhumanists] call for drastic forms of human self-limitation—whether that means the destruction of civilization, the renunciation of child-bearing, or the replacement of human beings by machines. These sacrifices are ways of expressing high ethical ambitions that find no scope in our ordinary, hedonistic lives: compassion for suffering nature, hope for cosmic dominion, love of knowledge. This essential similarity between anti-humanists and transhumanists means that they may often find themselves on the same side in the political and social struggles to come.

We don't know exactly what was discussed during the 'Good Club' and we don't know if they met again. I'm sure they have and the Guardian wrote "it is every indication that they will". But we should be deeply concerned that people with such radical views and such great wealth are trying to plan our futures. Especially when almost the same group of billionaires pop up ten years later to host Event 201 and try and influence individual country's pandemic policies and vaccine roll-outs.

The simple question remains - if this group is an altruistic one, with ethical and virtuous ideals, why the secrecy? Even if it was a mistake at the time, why not come out once the meeting had been discovered and say 'hands up, we met in private for these reasons, probably not the best way to go about it but we are concerned about X and have proposed to do X to solve the problem. I hope you are all onboard and will come up with other ideas to help. This is a global problem so we need everyone on the planet to come up with solutions'. 

Share: https://substack.com/profile/45856071-ne-nakedemperorsubstackcom?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email 

Fwd: Victim or Truth Warrior during 2023?

Victim or Truth Warrior during 2023?

Short term action items. You are not helpless. 

ROBERT W MALONE MD, MS JAN 5

LISTEN NOW · 15:34

Finishing up a podcast focused on the book late last week, an unexpected question dropped. It went something like this: "Many people are starting to feel overwhelmed by what has happened, what has been done to them, and feel that there is nothing that they can do to stop what is going on. What advice can you give them?"

Since then, over the last week I have had many versions of this question come from a wide variety of interviewers. One easy answer is to fall back on the final chapters of the "Lies My Government Told Me" book, each of which focus on specific action items:

What to do with a problem like HHS? Groupthink and the Administrative State. Don't be brain dead, think for yourself. Defend your sovereignty. People helping out one another. The Victory Garden. Letter to a Coerced mother.

Another is to focus on those three words which were the core of my speech on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial for the "Stop the Mandates" rally a year ago.  Integrity, Dignity, Community. And there is always the advice from Saint Augustine, sometimes known as the doctor of the Roman Catholic Church, who famously said "The truth is like a Lion. You don't have to defend it. Let it loose. It will defend itself."

We, you, do not have to be victims. We can all be "Truth Lions". Fifth Generation Warfare warriors. 

Easy words to write. How about some specific actions items, you ask? Let's start with just three things that everyone can accomplish over the next couple of months.

First task- learn about fifth generation warfare. 

Don't be intimidated by the new term, you will learn that this is something that you already know a lot about. If you are active on the internet, on social media, you already understand a lot about crowd psychology, trolls, bots, swarm decision making, and the power of influencers to help set the framework for how we see the world, how we interpret the fire hose of information coming at us. 

Think of this as akin to learning about how Madison Avenue advertising agencies manipulate you (and your children) to eat processed foods, drink sugary drinks, etc. Learn so that you can recognize their advertising tricks when they pull them. Advertising is typically deployed in corporate media, because that is central to the corporate media business model. 

What our governments, the pharmaceutical industry (and our military and intelligence agencies) have been doing to us is like deploying the the most powerful advertising campaign in the history of the world on all of us over the last three years. Including paying corporate media, social media "influencers", artists, musicians to surreptitiously advertise the approved narrative and these (typically unlicensed and relatively untested) medical products. And the starting point to fighting the ability of these "advertising" technologies to influence your mind, your thoughts, your emotions, is to learn how they work, and learn to recognize the tech when you encounter it. 

Know your enemy, his strategy and tactics. His mission and goal is to control what you think, believe, feel. To basically control your soul.

Fifth generation warfare is what has been deployed on you by your government.

Over the last three years, you and everyone around you has been subjected to military-grade psychological warfare technologies, developed for offshore combat to influence the thoughts and minds of state and non-state combatants and the cultures within which they exist, but deployed against the citizens of virtually every western nation by their own governments. All for our own good, of course, to compel acceptance of and thereby protect us with unlicensed, experimental medical products that were neither safe, nor were they fit to purpose - for example preventing infection, replication, and spread of a RNA respiratory coronavirus. 

No wonder that, in a world where the entire underlying culture has been fragmented, people have developed chronic free floating anxiety and a sense that nothing makes sense, combined with free floating anger- both of which needed an external enemy to resolve the psychological tension and cognitive dissonance- mass formation or mass hypnosis or mass psychosis or mass formation psychosis (choose your term) developed in a large fraction of the population. All of us were intentionally, psychologically manipulated by our governments. Some of us, for some reason, were able to break free of the manipulation and psy-ops, while the minds of others were swallowed whole.

In the case of the United States, this unfortunate fact has been documented in so many ways (including involvement of DHS, FBI, CIA and myriad other agencies), but most recently by the "Twitter Files".

In the case of Canada, there are a series of remarkable published essays that attest to this inconvenient truth:

Murray Brewster, Ashley Burke · CBC News · Posted: Jun 24, 2021 7:16 PM ET | Last Updated: June 25, 2021 (Link Here)

Portions of a military information campaign meant to influence the Canadian public during the COVID-19 pandemic continued to operate months after the chief of the defence staff at the time ordered it shut down in the spring of 2020, CBC News has learned. The Canadian military recently conducted four reviews of controversial initiatives. A copy of one of those reviews was obtained by CBC News under access to information legislation. That review shows that even after the then-chief of the defence staff, Jonathan Vance, verbally called off the overall influence campaign in April 2020, some influence activities aimed at Canadians carried on for another six months — until Vance issued a written edict in November 2020. "The public affairs, [civil-military cooperation] and influence activities that were taking place, particularly within [Joint Task Force Central], did not stop," says the review document, which looked at the origins of the influence campaign.

Military leaders saw pandemic as unique opportunity to test propaganda techniques on Canadians, Forces report says

A plan devised by the Canadian Joint Operations Command relied on propaganda techniques similar to those employed during the Afghanistan war.

David Pugliese  •  Ottawa Citizen

Published Sep 27, 2021

Military violated rules by collecting information on Canadians, conducting propaganda during pandemic: report

Investigations into the activities have concluded not only were rules not followed, but senior leaders also had no authority to conduct such initiatives.

Author of the article:

David Pugliese  •  Ottawa Citizen

Published Jun 24, 2021

Briant: Canadian military's bungled propaganda campaigns should be a lesson across NATO

Author of the article:

Emma Briant,  Special to the Citizen

Published Oct 11, 2021

Several Canadian Forces investigations into domestic propaganda and influence operations recently concluded with the results pointing to findings that should concern both Canadians as well as members of the public in other democracies. Those investigations focused on a series of oversight and policy failures on military "influence" activities aimed at Canadians. Among the questionable activities were the monitoring of Black Lives Matter organizers and their peaceful protests. In addition, the Canadian Forces conducted data mining of the social media accounts of members of the public in Ontario to try to determine their views of the Doug Ford government. Both activities were supposedly in support of the military's mission to help the elderly in long-term care homes during the pandemic, although it is difficult to see how these initiatives are remotely linked to such a mission. Today's military campaigns inhabit a world where digital technologies allow state actors to easily obscure operations that promote falsehoods, fear or partial information, confusing audiences about their intent and advancing a hidden agenda. In such an environment public trust in the officials in charge, and transparent, clear communications that secure such trust, are vital. All the activities investigated by National Defence were of course on the face of it, introduced to make Canadians safer. Yet, when democratic governments 'innovate' rapidly, in the process failing to ensure adequate guidance and oversight, not only do they risk violating citizens' rights – they fuel the dangerous propaganda that they aimed to counter. This blundering approach should be taken as a lesson across NATO on how important it is to communicate openly with citizens, tolerate criticism, and foster a meaningful conversation over new tactics. When faced with 'bad news' and criticism, militaries often see journalism exposing their blunders as the problem. Negative coverage is often seen by commanders as undermining their goals and can quickly lead to heavy handed solutions. The United Kingdom is currently making that mistake, where the government is responding to critical coverage by profiling journalists, denying Freedom of Information requests and proposing legislation to control information. Measures like these will further undermine public trust at a time when paranoid conspiracy theories are being weaponized.

Now that you can see what has been done to all of us, how can you learn to recognize fifth generation warfare strategies and tactics when they are deployed on you? Fortunately, there are resources.

Here are a couple of introductory substack essays:

Twitter is a Weapon, not a Business

In the information war, nothing is what it seems, and your mind is the battleground

Welcome to Fifth Gen (Information) Warfare

The battleground is consensus of the swarm and your own mind

That should get you started.

Here are more detailed texts that I recommend:

The Handbook of 5GW: A Fifth Generation of War?

The Citizen's Guide to Fifth Generation Warfare

Second task- find a way to forgive those around you that have been hypnotized.

As far as I am concerned, those who seek revenge should first dig two graves. I am absolutely not advising that we should have a truth and reconciliation commission and just forgive and forget those who have done this to us. And as shown by the recent full court corporate media propaganda push triggered by the unfortunate case of Damar Hamlin, they may talk the talk of forgiveness and reconciliation, but those that have cooperated with the government in deploying these thought weapons on us will continue to do so in the future unless we find a way to stop them.

I am speaking about your brother, sister, mother, uncle, grandfather, and your fellow workers. The ones that have not been as able to penetrate the fog of information war as you have. You can never help them, never persuade them of the truth, if you just want to hit them over the head with your version of truth. Or with a large stick. That just does not work. It requires a lot of time and patience to de-program someone who has been immersed in a cult. So learn to park your anger when you engage with others who are not yet "awake".

My secret weapon in these information war battles is that I generally come across as cool, calm, rational, data based. If you think that I am ready to forget those that have tortured me, think again. I am still mad as hell about the violence that has been done to all of us, and particularly to innocent children. But I keep a lid on it. Please, steal my weapon, use and and improve on it. Teach me through your actions how I can do better.

Third task- learn to deploy fifth generation warfare strategies, and then do so. Again and again. Practice makes perfect.

Here comes the best part of all of this. In fifth gen. warfare, there are no identifiable leaders, and the goal is to penetrate the mental space of one's opponent without them even being aware that this is being done. It is the maximal embodiment of decentralized, asymmetric warfare. In fifth gen. warfare, the goal is maximal impact with minimal energy. What this means is that all you need is your ability to discuss and persuade others of the truth as you know it. In line at the grocery store. At work when you are just chatting with a colleague. On social media! Each and every one of us can be fifth gen. information warriors. 

All I ask is that you keep those three little words in your mind and you begin to master these new methods. 

Commitment to Integrity

Respect for human Dignity

Always striving to build human Community

You are not powerless. In fact, learning information warfare tactics is sort of like learning martial arts. You can become a powerful weapon. So use that weapon wisely.

But don't allow yourself to be victimized. That is how they win.

---